<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ronnie W. Rogers, "Taking every thought captive..." &#187; Creation/Evolution/ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronniewrogers.com/category/creationidevolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com</link>
	<description>Notes from a not so notable pastor, "now concerning..."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Can a Fish Become an Attorney?</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2011/12/20/think-about-it-can-a-fish-become-an-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2011/12/20/think-about-it-can-a-fish-become-an-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=1458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is often said that all mutations are bad, but this is not actually true. There are cases of beneficial mutations, but what is needed for evolution to make a fish into an attorney is not merely a beneficial mutation, but rather the creation of new information, and therein is the problem. Even advantageous mutations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2011/12/20/think-about-it-can-a-fish-become-an-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetic Engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/06/24/genetic-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/06/24/genetic-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently Doug Gray presented a concise, detailed explanation of Genetic Engineering to the Roundtable in Ethics.  He begins with the scientific research that forms the basis for the current biotechnology, with an explanation of terms and events along the way.  He ends by considering the moral and ethical impact of this genetic altering technology.  This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/06/24/genetic-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: The Cruelty of Darwinian Compassion</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/26/think-about-it-the-cruelty-of-darwinian-compassion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/26/think-about-it-the-cruelty-of-darwinian-compassion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darwin says, “The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the social instincts…”1  He further states,“Nor could we check our sympathy, even at the urging of hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/26/think-about-it-the-cruelty-of-darwinian-compassion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Darwin the unbiased, benign observationist</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/07/blog-think-about-it-darwin-the-unbiased-benign-observationist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/07/blog-think-about-it-darwin-the-unbiased-benign-observationist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darwin is often presented as a simple scientist, with no axe to grind, to wit no preconceived ideas tainting his conclusions, and simply following the facts to wherever they lead.  The following are a few quotes that may call that noble description into question.   Darwin said, concerning man’s origin and descent, “The main conclusion…is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/07/blog-think-about-it-darwin-the-unbiased-benign-observationist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Marriage according to Darwin</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/01/think-about-it-marriage-according-to-darwin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/01/think-about-it-marriage-according-to-darwin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture/Politics/History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darwin expresses his dismay and discouragement because, in comparison to how very scrupulous a man is about the pedigree of his livestock, when it comes to his own marriage, “…he rarely, or never, takes any such care.  He is impelled by nearly the same motives as the lower animals, when they are left to their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/04/01/think-about-it-marriage-according-to-darwin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Darwin’s influence on The sanctity of human life</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/03/25/think-about-it-darwin%e2%80%99s-influence-on-the-sanctity-of-human-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/03/25/think-about-it-darwin%e2%80%99s-influence-on-the-sanctity-of-human-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Darwin asseverated that,   “…Species are produced and terminated by slowly acting and still existing causes, and not by miraculous acts of creation and by catastrophes.”1  He was so confident of his own acuity that he further averred, “…we may feel that the ordinary succession by generation has never once been broken, and that no cataclysm [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/03/25/think-about-it-darwin%e2%80%99s-influence-on-the-sanctity-of-human-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About It: The Difference between Evolution and Darwinism</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/24/think-about-it-the-difference-between-evolution-and-darwinism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/24/think-about-it-the-difference-between-evolution-and-darwinism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Biologist Jonathan Wells elucidates the critical distinction between evolution and Darwinism.  He notes, “Evolution means change over time”1 and of course no one doubts that.  “But Charles Darwin claimed far more than any of these things.  In The Origin of Species he set out to explain the origin of not just one or a few [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/24/think-about-it-the-difference-between-evolution-and-darwinism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Darwinian Evolution, is it mathematically possible?</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/12/think-about-it-darwinian-evolution-is-it-mathematically-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/12/think-about-it-darwinian-evolution-is-it-mathematically-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is Antony Flew’s recitation of the point by point refutation of “the monkey theorem” by Gerry Schroeder,1 which led Flew to conclude that the ‘monkey theorem’2 ‘was a load of rubbish.’”3  “Schroeder first referred to an experiment conducted by the British National Council of Arts.  A computer was placed in a cage with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/12/think-about-it-darwinian-evolution-is-it-mathematically-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT: Biblical Principles for loving the dying</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/08/think-about-it-biblical-principles-for-loving-the-dying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/08/think-about-it-biblical-principles-for-loving-the-dying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The vast majority of Christians will face difficult decisions regarding impending death of a loved one.  I am refining this list, as well as still thinking through other principles, but these have proven to be quite helpful in guiding me to think biblically about such eventualities. Strong families are essential since family members are the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2010/02/08/think-about-it-biblical-principles-for-loving-the-dying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think About IT:  What if a Christian said…</title>
		<link>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2009/09/16/think-about-it-what-if-a-christian-said%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2009/09/16/think-about-it-what-if-a-christian-said%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creation/Evolution/ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronniewrogers.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bible speaks of an existence prior to the creation of time and matter in which God alone existed.  Then, Genesis records God creating time and matter, in the words, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Genesis 1:1).  That singularity was the beginning of time and matter.  As Christians, we believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ronniewrogers.com/2009/09/16/think-about-it-what-if-a-christian-said%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

